I need a headset for Skype conversations and for background music that won't annoy other people who may be around. This weekend, I've been test driving a Plantronics CS-60 wireless headset which comes as part of the Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred Edition - a speech-to-text product. I promised the PR wonk that sent it I'd crank out a review so here goes.
I'm a fan of Plantronics kit. My DSP-300 headset has been a faithful companion for several years though I finally managed to wear out the headphone 'cushions' last month. It's not on the current Plantronics product list and for those that want this type of device, I'd opt for the updated and more robust DSP-500. Back to the CS-60.
As a USB powered wireless headset, it's the dog's nuts. It provides clear audio through several walls and up to around 50 feet distance from the machine before the signal starts to break up. This should be more than enough for anyone in an office environment. Sound quality doesn't quite match the DSP-300 but then it's a single earpiece device so maybe I'm expecting a bit much. I found I had to crank the volume up using Control Panel>Sounds to hear sound at an acceptable level.
You have to decide whether to attach one of the round-the-ear-hook-up-thingies or the over-the head-wire-jobby. I've got sticky out big ears so the over the head thingy is the only viable option. It's very comfortable though wearing one of these makes me look more of a pratt than normal.
The mic boom is a bit too snug to the face for my liking. It gets in the way when my beard develops an itch or when I try to eat a bacon sarny. My personal anatomy aside, the recorded sound quality is certainly on a par with the DSP-300 and the annoying background hum I had with the DSP300 on recorded items has disappeared.
Dragon Naturally Speaking version 8.1 is the latest incarnation of a long standing contender in the voice recognition, speech-to-text market. Voice recognition has never hit the mainstream though it has enojoyed popularity for those with physical impediments and in the medical profession.
Part of the reason has been the relatively poor level of 'understanding' these systems have of individual speech patterns. This has left the impression these systems are 'inaccurate.' The other reason is the necessity to spend time 'training' speech applications to understand your voice. This version is much easier and faster to train than any other speech-to-text application I've tried. The total direct time 'investment' was around 30 minutes. That's more than acceptable. Inevitably, it needs fine tuning but that need be no more inconvenient than making spell check corrections. The big question: would I use it in day-to-day life? A qualified 'yes.'
As I get older and do more work with speech related technologies - like podcasting - the computer keyboard seems increasingly irrelevant. Years of banging a keyboard have left their toll and I'd prefer a more 'natural' interface with the computer.
The speed at which Dragon transcribes my speech is an order of magnitude faster and more accurate than earlier versions. I can talk at a natural pace without having to stop and start every few moments to make corrections. My one caveat is that Dragon prefers Microsoft applications like Outlook and Word, while I prefer OpenOffice and Thunderbird. Also, I use a number of 'over the wire' applications that are not directly supported by Dragon. That translates into the inconvenience of developing a piece of material in say WordPad and then having to cut 'n' paste into the online application. But there are other areas where you'd find Dragon very convenient.
Say for example you use a Palm OS based PDA. You can dictatequick notes and then synch to your PC when you return to the office withouthaving to transcribe the notes. A real productivity boon.
At a tad under £200 this is not a cheap package. But the price will drop as wireless headsets become mainstream. Would I use it on a day to day basis? 50% of the time. Would I recommend it? Sure.
Technorati Tags : Dragon+Naturally+Speaking
Recent Comments